For specific tests see database Diagnostics for Animals.
GAPS :
Generally not.
GAPS:
Routine methods are described in the WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines: Chapter 3.7.5 Enzootic abortion of ewes (ovine chlamydiosis).
1. Identification of the agent.
a. Staining of smears of placental cotyledons, foetal stomach contents.
b. Antigen detection ELISAs
c. PCR and real time PCR of placental and swab samples, and/or foetal tissues/organs
d. Isolation of C. abortus in embryonated chicken eggs or in tissue culture
e. Immunohistochemistry
2. Serology
a. Complement Fixation Test
b. ELISA
GAPS :
As disease is endemic in Europe and throughout the world, the potential for commercial development of kits is clear.
GAPS :
Both inactivated and live vaccines are available, although the live vaccines are not available in all countries.
See also section “Main means of prevention, detection and control/Vaccines”.
No, although molecular markers have been identified for the C. abortus strain 1B commercial live vaccines.
GAPS :
This is one of the main aims in developing next generation vaccines.
See also section “Main means of prevention, detection and control/Vaccines”.
GAPS :
GAPS :
See section “Main means of prevention, detection and control/Vaccines”.
Use of genetically modified vaccines might be problematic in some countries. The field trials may need specific regulation regarding the release of GMOs into the environment.
Feasibility discussions are ongoing between scientific experts and some of the major animal health companies.
Currently used as part of a herd or flock control programme in many European countries.
Long acting oxytetracycline is the antibiotic most commonly used. Although the drug is recommended to be given as a single dose to minimize any potential development of resistance, the aim of the treatment is to suppress multiplication of the organisms to counter an ongoing outbreak of chlamydial abortion, therefore further doses are often given until lambing is completed.
GAPS :
See section “Main means of prevention, detection and control/Mechanical and biological control and /Therapeutics.
Potential pharmaceuticals which will eliminate the organism in the latent and carrier state.
GAPS :
Development of natural biocides and bacteriophages as therapeutics?
Depends on price and demand. If more effective vaccines and health schemes develop then there should not be a major demand for new pharmaceuticals. Vaccination should be favoured due to selective pressures exerted by the common or prolonged use of tetracycline and the possibility of emerging antimicrobial resistance.
No specific issues.
Feasible if demand exists.
GAPS :
In general, the development of tests is much faster and less expensive than developing vaccines. From development through validation to commercial availability will be time consuming and can take years.
The development and validation of new tests is time consuming and labour intensive which is costly. Costs cannot be specified as they will depend on the nature of the test and the cost of producing reagents and supplying reading or processing machines if necessary. Once validated there will need to be a commercial company willing to market the test.
Currently the technology does not exist to identify the latent carrier. This is a real technological challenge as the site of latency is unknown and may be difficult to sample routinely in a live animal. Accreditation schemes do exist where animals are monitored on a yearly basis to determine on a flock/herd basis whether infection is present on farm. This works well although anomalies do arise which can create difficulties for the farmer. Experimental studies show that following entry of infection into an animal a rise in antibody titre does occur, however this subsides as the organism latently persists in the non-pregnant animal. Catching this rise would require constant monitoring, which is impractical, but on a flock/herd basis it may be more feasible.
GAPS :
More robust serological based testing that will detect whether animals on a farm or flock/herd basis have become infected is needed as part of an accreditation scheme.
There is a requirement for safer, more stable, cheaper alternatives to the current vaccines. These will likely be based on recombinant protein technology, as multi-component subunit vaccines.
GAPS :
Although various virulence associated antigens have been described for C. abortus, further research is needed to obtain a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in infection, including the molecular functions behind the newly described ultrastructures in the organism’s developmental cycle. This may offer new perspectives for development of novel vaccine strategies as well as for diagnosis.
This would depend on the technology being employed, the identification of suitable candidate antigens, adjuvants and appropriate routes of delivery. Generally, once all of these issues have been resolved a timescale of 5-10 years to conduct efficacy and stability trials in pregnant animals, as well as licensing and marketing, would not be unreasonable.Employment of reverse vaccinology approaches to vaccine development could save money, time and labour and therefore enable faster movement to the clinical trial stages.
GAPS :
The big question is what do the pharmaceutical companies want in their next generation products, taking into consideration what is actually feasible from a scientific perspective? Discussions are ongoing between some scientific experts and the companies on this issue.
This is difficult to quantify as it involves, in addition to the technological antigen discovery and proof of concept work, trials in pregnant sheep to determine efficacy, reduction of abortions, pathology and shedding. A single typical sheep vaccine trials costs in excess of €400,000 and takes over 9 months to complete. Following a series of such trials, safety field trials would need to be conducted in order to enable the product to be authorised. So, costs in excess of €2M would not be unreasonable.
No specific requirement.
Time to develop would depend on the product and the trials necessary to validate efficacy and safety. Commercial production would then take further time. Five to 10 years is a realistic timeframe.
Expensive but difficult to assess as it will depend on the product and the trials necessary to validate and licence.
No specific requirement.
GAPS :
GAPS :
The organism is reported to be relatively stable in the environment and can survive for long periods (weeks to months) in freezing temperatures and for days during spring weather conditions.
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
Determine whether vectors such as ticks, mites or fleas are involved as vectors (mechanical or otherwise) for transmitting infection.
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
What is the role of chronic/subclinical C. abortus infections in cases of infertility in both pigs and cattle?
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
While C. abortus is recognised as a zoonotic agent, reports of human cases are rare, although this might be because they remain undetected/underreported and because the disease is not notifiable in humans.
GAPS :
Human infection can result from contact with infected sheep and goats. The risk of infection from contact with cattle is less clear. The risk to humans is mainly limited to pregnant women who have contact with C. abortus through assisting pregnant sheep or goats especially during the lambing or kidding season. Indeed, there are several reports of human abortion resulting from contact with lambing/aborting sheep and although relatively few cases occur annually, the potential danger to the pregnant woman and her developing foetus is considerable. Infection can occur as the result of direct contact with animals and their secretions, the inhalation of aerosols from contaminated material or the accidental ingestion of contaminated material through poor hygiene and biosafety/biosecurity practices.
GAPS :
GAPS :
Investigate cases of respiratory infections in humans and any association with exposure to C. abortus.
GAPS :
As human-to-human transmission has been recently confirmed to occur with C. psittaci it would be worthwhile to investigate possible cases of transmission involving C. abortus.
Aborted, stillborn or weak lambs/kids/calves/piglets that fail to survive are considered welfare issues for the mothers.
GAPS :
Any behavioural changes in the animals as a result of the loss of their young.
This is not known but is probably of low importance.
GAPS :
Investigate infection and disease in endangered ruminant species that are subject to ex-situ breeding programmes in captivity.
GAPS :
Infection kinetics should be investigated in cattle and pigs (in comparison to sheep and goats).
Spread of infection can be rapid depending on the amount of infectious material in the environment. However, the consequence of infection is not seen until the next pregnancy.
GAPS :
What is the situation in cattle and pigs?
Spread by C. abortus-infected incubating or carrier recovered animals. Some reports show high anti-C. abortus antibody titres in wild ungulates, but little is known about their role as carriers or reservoirs of infection.
GAPS :
What is the role of wildlife species as carriers or reservoirs of infection?
Ingestion or inhalation of infectious microorganisms (EBs), through contact with infected placentas, aborted foetuses, post-abortion uterine discharges and the soiled hindquarters of aborted ewes.
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
Diagnosis of infection is generally based on antibody responses at the time of abortion, which correlate very well with infection in sheep. This also applies to goats, but the situation in pigs and particularly cattle is much less clear.
GAPS :
GAPS :
Determine sanitary measures for cattle and pigs.
When chlamydial abortion occurs attention must be paid to reduce the risk of within-flock transmission by:
The use of long-acting tetracycline’s can be administered as an emergency treatment to reduce further potential losses, but should not routinely be used as a means of controlling infection due to issues of potential antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics should not be used in combination with the live vaccines.
Initiate a vaccination programme for the next breeding season where abortion has occurred in a flock, if infection becomes established in a flock or where there is a high level of infection in neighbouring farms (although this depends on provision of adequate biosecurity measures).
GAPS :
What are the recommendations for cattle and pigs?
There is currently no evidence for this.
A range of tools are available for diagnosing C. abortus infection in sheep and goats and these are well documented in the WOAH Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines: Chapter 3.8.5:
There are advantages and disadvantages to the use of some of these tests. Some serological tests (CFT, some ELISAs) detect antibodies induced by infection with other chlamydiae, including C. pecorum, which can be widespread in ruminants and can result in false positive test results. New ELISAs that are more sensitive and specific have been developed and commercialised.Molecular detection of organism DNA is generally superior over serology, being more sensitive and specific, although requiring more specialist equipment and is generally more expensive.A molecular DIVA has been developed based on PCR-RFLP and another based on High Resolution Melt (HRM) PCR that differentiate the live vaccinal 1B strain from wild-type strains.None of the current tests can detect persistently-infected carriers.
GAPS :
Currently both inactivated and live vaccines are available for use in sheep and goats but not cattle [not officially recommended but cattle can be administered twice the dose of live vaccine given to small ruminants].
Disadvantages :
Modern vaccine research should be focused on the development of next generation vaccines that are efficacious, but safe and more stable and cheaper to produce. Improved computational techniques and combined integrative strategies have the potential to simplify the process greatly. These techniques also have the potential to identify candidate proteins that would be overlooked by conventional experimentation. In particular, reverse vaccinology has proved effective in the discovery of antigenic subunit vaccines that would otherwise remain undiscovered. If methodology of reverse vaccinology is applied appropriately in vaccine design, it can save enormous amounts of money, time and labour.
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
Standards laid down in the WOAH Terrestrial Animal Health Code.
GAPS :
Vaccination, diagnostics, husbandry, biosafety/biosecurity and health education (e.g. leaflets focussing on occupational hazards to pregnant women).
Serological surveillance to assess the status of flocks/herds. This must be coupled with flock history as antibody is not a measure of current infection.
GAPS :
Vaccination is effective at reducing the clinical picture but is not suitable for the eradication of infection. Nevertheless, vaccination is the best option to control the disease.There is information on non-response to oxytetracycline administration in herds with confirmed chlamydial abortion in Southern Greece.
GAPS :
It is necessary to work on improving the currently available vaccines and/or to design new vaccines taking into account the prevalence of C. abortus variants especially in areas where potential non-response to tetracycline has been reported.
Usually controls are related to the herd/flock and are not implemented at a national or regional level. Costs are related to vaccination, diagnostic investigations and to possible treatment, as well as associated costs of dealing with abortions, losses in lamb production and in purchasing more expensive premium replacement livestock from accredited sources.
No. However, enzootic abortion is a WOAH listed disease, although no epidemiological events are officially reported as the disease is endemic in most European countries. Some European countries however operate their own disease surveillance systems with annual incidence figures provided. However, even then disease incidence is under reported. In the UK, around 44% of cases of ovine fetopathy due to an infectious cause are diagnosed as being caused by C. abortus. Figures are likely to be similar in other European countries.
GAPS :
Not available.
GAPS :
Not applicable.
Not known but will be low.
GAPS :
Requires better data on incidence.
Not known but will be low as infections are considered to be rare.
GAPS :
Requires better data on incidence to calculate costs of treatment.
When introduced into non infected flocks/herds abortion may occur in up to 30% of the ewes and as many as 60-90% of pregnant goats.
GAPS :
Impact for cattle and pigs is unknown.
Costs associated with diagnostic testing as well as use of vaccines and application and use of antibiotics contribute to the costs. Such costs can be prohibitively expensive for some small ruminant farmers.
GAPS :
Impact for cattle and pigs is unknown.
Reduced production of lambs and kids affecting food supply chain and food security.
GAPS :
GAPS :
Impact not known for cattle or for wild and farmed ruminants (e.g. European bison, water buffalos, yaks).
None.
None.
There is currently no evidence for this, although changes in climate will likely affect persistence of the organisms in the environment.
GAPS :
Investigate the persistence of the agent in the environment.
There is currently no evidence for this.
GAPS :
If vectors are involved in transmission, and vector populations vary in different regions/countries depending on climate or changes in climate, then this could affect infection rates. This should be investigated.
There is currently no evidence for this.
GAPS :
Weather could impact on persistence of organisms in the environment, with cooler weather resulting in organisms remaining viable for longer. Thus, persistence and viability of the pathogen in the environment under different climatic conditions should be investigated.
There is currently no evidence for this.
GAPS :
GAPS :
GAPS :
None known.
GAPS :
Requires investigation to determine if present in sheep flocks and goat herds.
Adequate surveillance, known flock history and management, improved diagnostics and use of vaccines all reduce need for use of antimicrobials.
Good flock management and use of diagnostics and vaccines to monitor and control infections and disease.
Not known.
Not known.
Technologies are currently available that detect changes in the movement of animals and drinking/eating patterns that may predict early lambing and abortion. The monitoring of body temperature is possible using under the skin sensors. Detection of prolonged elevated temperature in animals may provide an early warning of disease and potential for early lambing/abortion.
GAPS :
Technologies need to be validated to see if they are effective in predicting abortion and cost effective for the farmer.
Continuous surveillance through use of digital cameras would be required at different key times in relation to a potential infection and subsequent pregnancy.
GAPS :
Requirements would need to be identified and determined.
Limited data available on temperature changes following experimental oronasal infection of a flock of sheep.
GAPS :
Available data would need to be determined.
Outside experimental settings, standardisation of behavioural and temperature/ immune composition changes will be difficult metabolically.
GAPS :
Data standardisation would need to be determined and agreed.
It could be assumed that improved disease control would positively impact the ability of animals to respond to climatic changes.
GAPS :
Direct comparisons would need to be investigated at a flock level of infected versus uninfected animals over time and potentially generations of animals. Tangible productivity would need to be measured.
If the presence of disease was lessened or eradicated, this would lead to less resource use for the same number of animals in a group with the same output.
GAPS :
Experimental setting comparisons would need to be determined.
If the presence of disease was lessened or eradicated, this would likely result in less emissions and pollution for the same number of animals in a group with the same output.
GAPS :
Experimental setting comparisons would need to be determined.
Some countries such as the UK operate surveillance schemes to routinely test animals for a range of reproductive pathogens including C. abortus, Toxoplasma gondii, Campylobacter spp, Salmonella spp, Listeria monocytogenes etc.
GAPS :
Testing is generally based on individual PCR tests for different pathogens. Platforms for screening for a range of pathogens require development.
GAPS :
Development of multi-tandem PCR technology to test for a range of abortifacient pathogens.
Epidemiological modelling of chlamydial outbreaks in sheep flocks has been published. Simulation of data revealed the importance of the transmission rate (i.e. contact) and the number of infected replacements introduced at the start of an outbreak. Depending upon the rate of transmission, the year in which the peak number of affected ewes occurs and the number of years over which a high number of animals are affected varies.
GAPS :
Not known.
GAPS :
Intervention platforms need to be agreed and validated.
Not known.
GAPS :
Better coordination of strategies for communication and coordination on a local, regional, country and European basis need to agreed.
Better diagnostic tools are required, especially to identify the latent carrier. Improved vaccines which prevent shedding and which give 100% immunity are needed. The next generation of vaccines will be based on multi component recombinant antigens. These studies will be helped by a greater understanding of pathogenesis, understanding the extent of diversity across Europe and developing tools to identify and manipulate targets for vaccine development studies.
David Longbottom (Moredun Research Institute, UK) – [Leader]
Nicole Borel (University of Zurich, Switzerland)
Maria Rosa Caro Vergara (University of Murcia, Spain)
Mireia Fontseca Presta (HIPRA S.A., Amer, Girona, Spain)
Karine Laroucau (ANSES, Paris, France)
Bryan Markey (University College Dublin, Ireland)
Carlos Montbrau Morcillo (HIPRA S.A., Amer, Girona, Spain)
Laura del Rio (University of Murcia, Spain)
Christiane Schnee (Friedrich-Loeffler Institute, Jena, Germany)
Victoria Siarkou (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece)
Daisy Vanrompay (University of Ghent, Belgium)
Sean Wattegedera (Moredun Research Institute, UK)
23 November 2022